tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10713928.post3831504001264365915..comments2024-03-28T01:17:43.262+01:00Comments on Temposchlucker: Examples 2,3: prelimanary movesTemposchluckerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07977208394417444785noreply@blogger.comBlogger9125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10713928.post-22074948893516009302017-03-10T02:08:59.636+01:002017-03-10T02:08:59.636+01:00A rule of thumb when aknight can check see what ot...A rule of thumb when aknight can check see what other squares are impacted and look to force a decoy to that square. Jim Takchessnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10713928.post-70000978689397473162016-04-05T21:46:17.436+02:002016-04-05T21:46:17.436+02:00The old habit of trial&error is strong, and ha...The old habit of trial&error is strong, and hard to unlearn.Temposchluckerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07977208394417444785noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10713928.post-62323927721766850672016-04-04T21:21:22.529+02:002016-04-04T21:21:22.529+02:00Yes, you did. It is an excellent point.Yes, you did. It is an excellent point.Robert Coblehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12427520849707914818noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10713928.post-84130039765529617022016-04-04T18:39:30.217+02:002016-04-04T18:39:30.217+02:00Many master suggest's something like this : Ca...Many master suggest's something like this : Caclulate the most forcing lines first.<br /><br />But i like to stay in the system of weakness-method. The problem of example 2 is that every piece is tactical weak, but: the weak king has to defend the weak rook which defend the not quite that weak knight. In a way the king is "pinned" to the rook, the standard method to make use of the "pin" is to attack the immobilised piece.<br /><br />A system of interacting weaknesses is a weakness of higher orderAoxomoxoA wonderinghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16058687381216896080noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10713928.post-85220419327178230312016-04-04T15:20:13.340+02:002016-04-04T15:20:13.340+02:00This tells you something about the limitations of ...This tells you something about the limitations of pattern recognition. Patterns that aren't there yet are difficult to recognize.Temposchluckerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07977208394417444785noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10713928.post-28701773236677416192016-04-04T14:43:39.769+02:002016-04-04T14:43:39.769+02:00In fact, all tactical motifs in a combination whic...In fact, all tactical motifs in a combination which are preliminary for the final trap or duplo attack are preparing the targets and the attackers into the right position. See the fist diagram. The skewer doesn't cash in the wood, it lures the king to its final place where it undergoes the final execution of the double attack. The skewer only preserves the initiative, while forcing the king in the right direction. So the preliminary tactical motifs have the same function as preliminary moves: to direct the targets and the attacker(s) into the position for the final blow.<br /><br />I wonder if this means that we should focus on CCT moves with the least possible answers.<br /><br />I hope you understand what I mean.Temposchluckerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07977208394417444785noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10713928.post-84626341400384115932016-04-04T11:40:54.026+02:002016-04-04T11:40:54.026+02:00Question to native English speakers: do I use the ...Question to native English speakers: do I use the word "preliminary" correct? In the the sense of "preparing (for the trap or duplo attack)?Temposchluckerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07977208394417444785noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10713928.post-59593687479570951532016-04-04T03:30:47.523+02:002016-04-04T03:30:47.523+02:00That's the big question.
A gain of wood must a...That's the big question.<br />A gain of wood must always make use of at least one of my five steps. If none is found, there must be a preliminary move. There is no alternative. We already know that a preliminary move is an element of CCT, since the initiative must be preserved. Further I expect that the target of the preliminary move will have a relative high value, and that the move is so forcing that it leaves only one possibility. In the first diagram, white has not 5 logical moves for the king, as you suggest, but just 1.Temposchluckerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07977208394417444785noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10713928.post-62793126736424290802016-04-04T02:49:51.845+02:002016-04-04T02:49:51.845+02:00I am not sure if you know what I mean, but the sec...I am not sure if you know what I mean, but the second example (diagram) is much simpler that the first one. Why is that?<br /><br />Compare the Kings at BOTH of the diagrams:<br /><br />1) White King has 5 moves<br />2) White King has just 1 move<br /><br />I can understand and comprehend FULL position due to the King's restriction. And if you look closely the two squares (f1+e2) creates a diagonal. That's why finding Bc4+ is a way easier than "usual".<br /><br />And what about puzzle 1? It is quite hard to me to see the solution as there no visible motifs to exploit. Ok, we have Rd6 not protected, but what else? I bet most weaker players would not solve this puzzle below 2-3 minutes. But the second puzzle may be solved easily within one minute.<br /><br />I think one has to notice the possibility to create an X-ray motif: it is hardly visible (hidden well enough) to recognize it unless you solve the puzzle (or know the solution before).<br /><br />Can any of you explain how to discover such hidden motifs at such puzzles? This one is really tricky as it contains deflection, removing of the guard and duplo attack (as the final shot).Tomaszhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09690570865003924020noreply@blogger.com