.
.
.
I don't really want to study openings anymore. Especially not now since I'm preparing for Corus. Yet sometimes events have their own momentum.
I have looked for a suitable opening against 1.d4 for about 10 years now. My main problem with 1.d4 always has been that you are almost obliged to play e6 at a certain moment, thus leaving a hole on e5 where sooner or later a piece or a pawn appears. Sofar I have tried the Pirc, KID, Slav, Semislav, Benko, Budapest, Fajarowitsch, QID, Classic Dutch, Nimzo-Indian, Albins Countergambit, Englund gambit, Benoni. I might have forgotten a few. At the moment I play the Polar Bear. That works fine, but the Polar Bear has a lot less "punch" with black than it has with white.
Against 1.e4 I have played the Najdorf, Scandinavian, French, Petroff, Polish, Italian, Spanish, Alekhine. At the moment I play the Caro-Kann.
A lot of these openings have started with a very nice initial idea. But due to refutations and novelties as answer to refutations, overtime most of these openings have becom monstruosities where the initial idea has disappeared out of sight long ago. Leaving behind a waterheaded opening with little more merit than being "playable".
The past two months I have been studying the Black Lion for Margriet, since she complained about her black opening against 1.d4 too. And so it happened that I stumbled upon the Hanham variation of the Philidor. In previous years I considered this opening as too unambitious and only suitable to bore your opponent to death. But I have changed my mind the past years due to positional study. Now I see that the positon of black is full of potential. Much like a hedgehog-position. You must bring the opening alive yourself! This is the same as in the Caro-Kann which I'm playing now. But I always felt the positions of the Caro-Kann as somewhat alien to me. While the positions of the Hanham feel familiar and trusted from the first time I delved into them. I could have invented it myself:)
The Black Lion provides me with the Pirc moveorder which is the only trusted way to reach the Hanham. It can be played against 1.e4 and 1.d4. I will give it a go at Corus.
In the mean time I'm busy to read My System for the second time. Now in the new English translation which is much better than the old one. For the moment doing exercises has fallen to the wayside, but I intend to give the Phaedrus exercises a go.
There are a few promises from me about which I would write (a reaction to the comments at the previous post, a reaction to Robert Pearson's question) , but I cannot substantiate that at the moment due to Corus preparation. I will not forget it though. I must be careful with my time.
If you feel good with an opening then dont hesitate to play it.
ReplyDeleteI dont think i will play the black lion myself since after looking at it on that website you mentioned and playing over some games i dont feel comfortably in the positions like i have at the moment with the french opening.
I wish you good luck with your new opening and hope you can surprise numerous of players with it at the Corus tournament.
Never read my System of minzowitch. What is so good at that book that it make you to read it a second time?
CT,
ReplyDeleteMy System describes matters at a high conceptual level. I like that very much. But that makes it difficult to transfer it into practical play, just as you pointed out in the comment on my previous post.
Dvoretsky writes that studying My System was the main cause for him to reach masterlevel. The book shouldn't just be read, but studied.
Besides that the book is very readable and witty. The german word "Temposchlucker" is an invention of Nimzowitsch.
After 1.d4 d6 I bet White is usually going to play 2.c4 rather than 2.e4.
ReplyDeleteAha, "Temposchlucker" is from Nimzowitsch! I should have guessed. Unfortunately, I have only read My System in English. However, now I still feel a bit more intelligent! :)
ReplyDeleteIf you translate 'temposchlucker' to English what does it mean? One who gives away tempi?
ReplyDeleteSchlucker means Swallower.
ReplyDeleteOoh, kinky. :)
ReplyDeleteCaro Kann is a quite calm opening but it may be quite boring... definitely I prefer the Najdorf.
ReplyDeleteThe Tarrasch is the ticket against d4.
ReplyDeletedick, not to offend, but isnt it a bit late in your chess career NOT to know what opening you wish to play?
ReplyDeletethis is--said without a hint of hostility--a weakness.
i play the caro-kahnn. that said, when i finally saw that the slav paired with it so well, it was like release from prison in all the other mess i tried against 1.d4.
against 1.c4, c6, etc.
now, there must be a high level answer to your no longer vacillating, and selecting a system. not the best or 2nd best system, but damn it, select and stick with it.
its like the men age fifty still chasing the next your girl. immature.
zen master, screaming, grabs the student by the neck, asking him:
'what can you do?'
dk
dk
dick, not to offend, but isnt it a bit late in your chess career NOT to know what opening you wish to play?
ReplyDeletethis is--said without a hint of hostility--a weakness.
i play the caro-kahnn. that said, when i finally saw that the slav paired with it so well, it was like release from prison in all the other mess i tried against 1.d4.
against 1.c4, c6, etc.
now, there must be a high level answer to your no longer vacillating, and selecting a system. not the best or 2nd best system, but damn it, select and stick with it.
its like the men age fifty still chasing the next your girl. immature.
zen master, screaming, grabs the student by the neck, asking him:
'what can you do?'
dk
dk
DK,
ReplyDeleteLogic is my inner God. If logic reasoning tells me to change I must obey. You ask me to be unfaithful to my inner God. I can't.