Yesterday I read my blog posts of the past half year. There is really a wealth of knowledge in them. If I look at my recent games, I simply forget to apply that knowledge though.
How come? A few reasons:
- Old habits are strong.
- The area covered by the knowledge is too broad. There isn't simply enough time to evaluate everything. What you don't do automatically you can't do at all during a game. Due to lack of time and short term memory overload.
- On the other hand there are area's in the game that aren't covered at all. Examples are openings and dynamic positions.
I play the Polar Bear. That sometimes means that I play 10 or 12 bookmoves in a row and then all of a sudden a weak diagonal (c5-g1) has befallen upon me. Where did that come from?
Actually it is the first move (1.f4) that already weakens that diagonal. Since most theory puts the black bishop on g7, the weak diagonal is usually no problem. But when black doesn't know the theory he often puts his bishop on c5. "Theory" of the Polar Bear doesn't take this into account. So I'm on my own. Maybe a Stonewall renders this bishop useless, but I'm not very familiar with that type of positions.
What I don't like in this scenario is that I make openingmoves that lay the seeds for future characteristics of the position while not knowing the moment I do this. It simply can't be good to start to play chess at move ten. It should start at move one!
Today I started to think about the first move. If the knowledge I have formulated the past half year is any good it should be applicable to the opening too. Indeed it is, but it took me about 6 hours to formulate the answer to 1.e4 f5. To find a narrative in concord with my theory that gives the best reply.
If it takes 6 hours to formulate a move, the theory isn't ready for application yet. So it isn't very strange I don't apply the new knowledge in my games.