What is going on?
A lot, actually. But most is not worthy to write a post about, so I obey the discipline to write nothing when I have nothing to say. In the meantime I'm working hard.
The essence of my new method is that system 2 does the work and system 1 looks over its shoulder. In the past 23 years system 2 didn't learn anything useful from my games. Now it is totally different. Drawing logical conclusions from your own games without a coach, is no sinecure. There are a whole lot of holes in my bucket, and no game is the same. Of course if it was otherwise, chess would be boring soon. But it is a lot of work to conceptualise ideas in a way that they become useful for other games, without over conceptualizing it by transiting it into trivialities.
Take for instance the idea of the good and the bad bishop. When the pawn structure isn't fixed, you cannot say which bishop is good and which is bad.
- So you must develop some logical ideas about how to force the fixing of the pawns.
- And when the pawns are fixed, you must find tactical ways to trade your bad bishop against his good bishop.
- And when you managed to do so, you must prevent your opponent from unfixing the pawns, otherwise his bishop becomes good again.
- And you must avoid that he trades off his bad bishop, but not in such ridgid way that you compromise your piece play because you have to duck everytime.
- And when you have finally reached the intended good knight against bad bishop endgame, you must learn how how to convert that into a win.
Tempo said : "And when the pawns are fixed, you must find tactical ways to trade your bad bishop against his good bishop."
ReplyDeleteor often even better: Trade the bad bishop against a knight. In a position with fixed pawns a knight might be better than a bishop.
That is what I found too, indeed.
DeleteWe need to generalize insights: We need to exchange bad pieces against good ones but must not forget the potential development of the activities of the pieces in the future (endgame)
ReplyDeleteGreat to write your post after 2 months! Wishing you all the best!
ReplyDeleteResult = what x how = positional goal x tactical means.
ReplyDeleteBlogger has changed its e-mail notification system again, so currently I don't see automatically when there are new comments. So feel free to send me an e-mail if I don't react here. I will look for a work around.
ReplyDeleteYour description of all the steps it takes to actually improve in a concrete way is daunting, yet realistic. It also means that for those of us who have yet to learn all these things, it means there is plenty of room for improvement !
ReplyDelete