PGN viewer test 02
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
New ...
New Game
Edit Game
Setup Position
Open...
PGN
FEN
Share...
Share Board (.png)
Share Board (configure)
Share playable board
Share game as GIF
Notation (PGN)
QR Code
Layout...
Use splitters
Swipe notation/lists
Reading mode
Flip Board
Settings
| Move | N | Result | Elo |
|---|---|---|---|
| Position not in LiveBook |
Please, wait...
35...Bc7 36.Bh4 hxg4+ 37.Kxg4 Kg7 38.Bf6+ Kf7 39.Kg5 Both the king
and the bishop cannot move. b5 The only option for black is to try this 40.Kh6 bxa4 41.bxa4 Bb6 42.h4 Bc7 43.Kh7 Bb6 44.Be7 Luring the black
King away Kxe7 45.Kxg6 Kf8 46.h5 Kg8 47.Kf6 Attack on two fronts Bd8+ 48.Kxe6 Kg7 49.Kd7 Bh4 50.e6 Kf8 51.h6 Change of front again Bf6 52.f5 Bg5 53.h7 Kg7 54.e7 Change of front again Bxe7 55.Kxe7 Kxh7 56.f6 And black resigns
- Start an analysis engine:
- Try maximizing the board:
- Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
- Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
- Drag the split bars between window panes.
- Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
- Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
- Create an account to access the games cloud.
| White | EloW | Black | EloB | Res |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yifan | - | Humpy | - |
Please, wait...
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
The PGN Viewer seems to be working fine. I use the Microsoft Edge browser.
ReplyDeleteSpeaking for myself, these last few blog posts have been very enlightening. Initially, it was difficult to “SEE” the strategic direction of the game. After several days of investigating GM Stockfish’s concrete recommended variations (maintaining the balance), as well as carefully thinking about the explanatory power of creating a logical narrative, the general strategic direction became much clearer—and also is useful for future explorations in similar positions without “obvious” tactical tension.
ReplyDeleteGM Stockfish is easiest to follow when a concrete tactical sequence is proposed. It is much more difficult to “understand” (in human terms) what is going on strategically. My System gives the underlying strategic ideas in simplified clear-cut positions, but there is a huge intellectual distance between his examples of those “rules” and the kinds of positions created in current day chess praxis.
Hartelijk dank!
You're welcome!
DeleteFor me it is very enlightening too. It raises the question, what if I had studied this 24 years earlier? Then I probably wasn't able to do this. The past 24 years were needed in order to be able to discriminate between the wheat and the chaff. I'm no longer disturbed by all the different ideas and views of grandmasters an former world champions. In the end you need to be able to think for yourself.
Furthermore, now my tactical prowess is slowly increasing day by day, the confidence grows that I can play in accordance with my ideas (no matter whether these ideas are correct or need more feedback). I remember my attempts long ago where I tried to get a bishop pair at all costs and then was forced to hand it over a few moves later because I wasn't strong enough tactically.