Temposchlucker

 I sorted out the 197 items that I found in the 50 positional problems I'm working on. I made a decision  which items I must study first. I decided to focus on the pawn breaks. These are the most complicated and probably rewarding items to study first. There are a lot of aspects that must be learned. Today I focus on the pivot points. The saying goes "if a pawn is well protected by pieces, it probably stands in the way". This means that when a pawn moves, a pivot point behind it becomes cleared. There are two preconditions which might make you refraining from playing a pawn break: When your king is not safe When you are behind in development When your king is not safe, opening the position might become disastrous. When you are behind in development, your opponent might be the one who is going to profit from the opened lines of attack instead of you. A single pawn move might have an effect on: 6 squares (knights) 4 diagonals (bishops) 3 files (rooks) So it might have a big...

 While the building of a positional framework is on its way, I analyze the games I play. For 23 years I didn't do that, because I didn't know how to do that. In december I played a tournament, and I found three areas where I suck. The opening, king assault and endgames. It seems that I managed to fix my opening problems. Usually I emerge on top after the opening nowadays. I calculated somewhere that the mastering of the endgame will gain me another 150 rating points. I have to start with studying endgames yet. The games that I played the last three months point mostly at the assault of the king as the main culprit for sucking though. After a successful opening, the question arises, what now? The building of a positional framework is intended to give a partly answer to that question. I'm sure it will. But mostly, I am ready for a king assault, but I struggle to get it off the ground. All of a sudden I start to use excessive time, while I am looking for tactics that aren'...

 I started with  the-woodpecker-method-2-positional-play  some time ago. As usual, finding the right beginning is the most difficult thing to do. In the criticism on the course, there are a lot of complaints about the completeness of the analysis. I highly disagree with that. The fact is that you simply have to put a lot of effort in it yourself. Furthermore, I think you can't do without  the video. The video is chockfull of little details. It takes a lot of time to work out all these details. In the video, GM Axel Smith is solving the problems himself. Other people have gathered the problems for him. And although this is the second time around that he solves these problems, he has forgotten most solutions. It gives a pretty authentic insight in how a grandmaster thinks when solving a positional problem. The first task it to inventorize all details of what he is saying. The second step is to categorize these details. The third step is to build a positional framework ...

  Black to move 1k6/1b3p1p/p7/3qp3/Np5Q/4BP2/PPP3rP/R4K2 b - - 1 26 Jean-Marc Degraeve vs. Laurent Guidarelli (2003) Source Chessable The Checkmate Patterns Manual The black queen and bishop cooperate to invade f3 Once invaded, a new invasion square emerges: The black rook and queen eye to f2 But that focal point is defended by the white queen and bishop After 1. ... Qxf3+ 2. Bf2 the helper black rook sacrifices itself 2. ... Rg1+ and acts as a magnet to attract the white king to another square  White gives mate from one of the two invasion squares g2 or h1 The invasion squares are clearly dynamic, and move with the pieces