LoA based modelling
Repertoire books about the opening are geared around the tree of analysis, around variations. But thinking in variations is a quite arduous task. Because the center of gravity of an idea seems to shift through the variations. If you take the idea of an Aurora Australis attack in the Colle Zukertort, then you can reach that attack via quite different move orders. Variations are just too volatile to act as the base for the description of an idea.
It is much more logical to gear the description of an idea around the lines of attack (LoAs). The LoAs shift at a much slower pace during the game. Furthermore, the ideas have a close relation to the LoAs. It is a nice idea to give ideas names, like Aurora Australis, Aurora Borealis, Aurora Polaris and Noah's Ark attack, but you can't give every idea a catchy name.
It would be handy to give each LoA a separate name though.
| Diagram 1. Black to move |
r1b2rk1/p1qn1ppp/1p1bpn2/2ppN3/3P1P2/1P1BP3/PBPN2PP/R2Q1RK1 b - -
I dubbed this position as follows:
- Model 1: this position
- LoA 1: diagonal b2 - h8
- LoA 2: diagonal d3 - h7
- LoA 3: file h
| Diagram 2. Black to move |
The moves by the pieces in the blue circles have no effect on the LoAs of interest. This means you can start the Aurora Australis attack when these pieces move. Let's have a look at the other moves:
- cxd4: Prevents the clearance move dxc5 from white
- g6: Blocks LoA 2 but creates new holes and hence new LoAs around the black king. Furthermore, it can help as a leverage for white to open files against the black king (new LoAs)
- Rd8, Re8: opens an escape route for the black king
- Be7, Qe8: reïnforces Nf6, hence LoA1
- h6: blocks LoA 3
So white is ready to attack whenever black does nothing to prevent it.
ReplyDeleteWriting (or studying, for that matter) a repertoire book seems to be an astonishing inefficient way to convey ideas. Before you know it, you get lost in the variants while you even got no chance to understand what it is actually all about.
ReplyDelete